|
|
Post by Gambit on Apr 9, 2011 4:22:51 GMT -5
The variants are ranged from maximum to minimum freedom of SPCs. This is not a game rule or anything, I was just curious about who thinks what about this notion in RPGs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shade on Apr 9, 2011 5:13:58 GMT -5
Just what I think for my characters.  |
|
|
|
Post by wallflower on Apr 9, 2011 9:30:22 GMT -5
I don't have a serious opinion about this, but I would never have even thought to pair my own characters or have a thread with only my characters. It seems a bit like talking to oneself.
On the other hand, with so many of us playing so many different characters, I feel like it would be a bit limiting to never have more than one character in group threads.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gambit on Apr 9, 2011 15:42:17 GMT -5
Well, objectively speaking, in some situations interaction between people is unavoidable (and not just like "we're both X-Men", but also "these two people have spent two years living under the mansion's roof so they have probably communicated with each other on a few occasions"), but I'm just wondering how players limit this notion for themselves.
|
|
|
|
Post by Typhoid on Apr 10, 2011 15:09:04 GMT -5
I guess I personally save it for the 'unavoidable' scenario. If I have two characters that are on the same team/must interact, then I'm OK with it (as an example from the present plotline, if Storm had to have a conversation with Omen). I do my best to avoid those types of threads, though. In a lot of cases I'll just have a post somewhere that states what the conversation involved.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nimrod / Nicholas on Jun 6, 2011 1:26:56 GMT -5
I would be tempted to have someone else post as one of my characters, while I played the other. They would use the npc account or their own and paste a declaration (I am playing joe's character in this thread) at the start of each post. Maybe with my characters Icon.
This could lead to laughs as they use their own interpretation of my character.
|
|
